FlavoRotor is in developmentSee the current stage
Research

Crop programmes · CROP-STR-001

Strawberry research programme

A later-stage programme that separates root-zone system suitability, nutrient strength, N×K interaction, fruit chemistry and sensory quality.

MarkdownJSONRevised 2026-07-29
In brief

A later-stage programme that separates root-zone system suitability, nutrient strength, N×K interaction, fruit chemistry and sensory quality.

Why strawberry is phase two

Strawberry requires a longer cycle, flowering and fruit set, stronger root-zone oxygen control, pollination management and post-harvest standardisation. A 2025 system comparison found the tested substrate system outperformed the tested water-culture systems, so the FlavoRotor root zone must be validated before flavour treatment claims.

Two different literature anchors

AnchorpH / ECCorrect interpretation
system comparisonpH 5.5–6.5; EC 0.75–1.25 mS/cmoperating range used in that multi-system study, not a taste optimum
Kuemsil nutrient strength1/3: pH 6.2, EC 1.1; 1/2: 6.0, 1.5; 2/3: 5.9, 1.9; full: 5.8, 2.5exact treatment combinations for cultivar Kuemsil and that formulation/system

reported the two-thirds treatment as the best compromise for the tested Kuemsil crop, but that result is not universal.

Programme sequence

  1. Validate survival, flowering, fruit set and root-zone oxygen under one conservative recipe.
  2. Compare root support/medium configurations before nutrient-strength optimisation.
  3. Test nutrient strength in one named cultivar.
  4. Run an N×K factorial only after stable baseline production.
  5. Measure yield, °Brix, titratable acidity, firmness, volatiles and blinded sensory profile together.

supports the N×K interaction design; supports combining volatile, quality and sensory analysis across cultivars.

Strawberry yield and soluble solids under N and K treatments

Published main-factor means; point details retain concentration, yield, °Brix and firmness.

Yield (g) Soluble solids (°Brix) 1151059585 9.39.69.910.210.510.6 NO₃⁻–N 9 NO₃⁻–N 12 NO₃⁻–N 15 K⁺ 5 K⁺ 7 K⁺ 9 K⁺ 11 NO₃⁻–N main-factor mean K⁺ main-factor mean
Values
SeriesValueNote
NO₃⁻–N 9 mol·m⁻³Yield 89.3 g · 10.5 °BrixFruit firmness 2.99 N.
NO₃⁻–N 12 mol·m⁻³Yield 108 g · 10.0 °BrixFruit firmness 3.34 N.
NO₃⁻–N 15 mol·m⁻³Yield 111 g · 9.51 °BrixFruit firmness 3.56 N.
K⁺ 5 mol·m⁻³Yield 90.8 g · 9.30 °BrixFruit firmness 3.04 N.
K⁺ 7 mol·m⁻³Yield 102 g · 9.69 °BrixFruit firmness 3.56 N.
K⁺ 9 mol·m⁻³Yield 103 g · 9.73 °BrixFruit firmness 3.38 N.
K⁺ 11 mol·m⁻³Yield 114 g · 10.6 °BrixFruit firmness 3.31 N.

Preciado-Rangel et al. (2020), Plants, 9(4), 441, Table 1, PDF p. 2. Values transcribed without interpolation.

Strawberry fruit quality by nutrient-solution strength

Treatment means are shown in their original units.

Treatment Fruit mass
g·plant⁻¹
Soluble solids
°Brix
Firmness
N/Ø3
Titratable acidity
%
Values
SeriesValueNote
⅓-strength solution248.9 g·plant⁻¹ · 11.51 °BrixFirmness 2.24 N/Ø3; titratable acidity 0.56%.
½-strength solution268.4 g·plant⁻¹ · 12.55 °BrixFirmness 2.27 N/Ø3; titratable acidity 0.58%.
⅔-strength solution278.0 g·plant⁻¹ · 12.55 °BrixFirmness 2.53 N/Ø3; titratable acidity 0.59%.
Full-strength solution243.9 g·plant⁻¹ · 12.07 °BrixFirmness 2.33 N/Ø3; titratable acidity 0.64%.

Zebro et al. (2025), Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, 1685755, Table 5, PDF p. 7. Values transcribed without interpolation.

Article bibliography

Sources used on this page