How complete elemental recipes, coupled ions, stock compatibility and tissue measurements replace simplistic nutrient-to-taste rules.
Explanation
Adding one fertilizer changes every ion carried by that salt. A KNO₃ dose changes both potassium and nitrate; it is not a pure “sweetness” command.
Mass balance
ExplanationThe new amount of one ion equals the previous amount plus stock additions, minus plant uptake and losses.
ExplanationFinal concentration is the final ion amount divided by the final mixed solution volume.
Separate N, P and K limitation
The USDA Bibb lettuce dataset changes one target nutrient concentration at a time and reports fresh mass through day 32 after transplant. The day-32 response is not monotonic for every nutrient. Nitrogen rises from 1.16 g at 5 mg·L⁻¹ to 250.73 g at 132 mg·L⁻¹, then falls to 74.11 g at 264 mg·L⁻¹. Phosphorus rises from 9.14 g at 1 mg·L⁻¹ to 250.73 g at 31 mg·L⁻¹. The potassium series contains a wide interval at 42 mg·L⁻¹, so that treatment mean should not be read without its uncertainty.
Fresh mass under separate nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium limitation
Each panel preserves the nutrient's own concentration scale. Points show the authors’ day-32 treatment mean and published 95% interval.
Values
| Series | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen · 5 mg·L⁻¹ | 1.16 ± 0.37 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Nitrogen · 11 mg·L⁻¹ | 32.57 ± 9.22 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Nitrogen · 26 mg·L⁻¹ | 56.62 ± 21.95 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Nitrogen · 33 mg·L⁻¹ | 47.73 ± 7.35 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Nitrogen · 66 mg·L⁻¹ | 100.42 ± 24.14 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Nitrogen · 132 mg·L⁻¹ | 250.73 ± 25.41 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Nitrogen · 264 mg·L⁻¹ | 74.11 ± 10.90 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Phosphorus · 1 mg·L⁻¹ | 9.14 ± 4.57 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Phosphorus · 2 mg·L⁻¹ | 59.23 ± 14.68 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Phosphorus · 5 mg·L⁻¹ | 133.56 ± 18.20 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Phosphorus · 12 mg·L⁻¹ | 176.31 ± 21.98 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Phosphorus · 31 mg·L⁻¹ | 250.73 ± 25.41 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Potassium · 2 mg·L⁻¹ | 22.76 ± 4.89 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Potassium · 13 mg·L⁻¹ | 61.17 ± 6.97 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Potassium · 21 mg·L⁻¹ | 84.91 ± 16.06 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Potassium · 42 mg·L⁻¹ | 128.31 ± 174.63 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Potassium · 105 mg·L⁻¹ | 89.75 ± 30.96 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
| Potassium · 210 mg·L⁻¹ | 128.71 ± 15.45 g | Treatment mean fresh mass at day 32 after transplant; ± is the published 95% confidence-interval half-width. |
Note. Values reproduced from Sharkey, Chen, and Altman (2025), author-formatted NPK.CrossT.All.xlsx, day 32 after transplant. No curve was fitted and no point was interpolated.
The graph preserves each nutrient's actual concentration scale and the authors' 95% confidence intervals. It demonstrates two practical points: nutrient response can be curved rather than linear, and equal EC values do not imply equal elemental availability.
Nutrient solution and tissue chemistry
El-Nakhel and colleagues tested green and red lettuce with calcium-, magnesium- or potassium-dominant macrocation ratios. The complete design contains three biological replicates in each of six cultivar-by-solution cells. The published measurements include total nitrogen, sulphate, six organic acids and total chlorophyll.
Nutrient-solution composition altered measured lettuce chemistry
Rows combine cultivar and dominant macrocation. Colour is normalised only within each chemical measurement; select a cell for the original unit.
Values
| Series | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Green lettuce · Calcium solution · N | 42.729 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.506 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.292 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Calcium solution · Sulphate | 1.061 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.014 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.008 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Calcium solution · Malate | 41.351 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 2.188 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 1.263 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Calcium solution · Chlorophyll | 130.271 mg·kg⁻¹ FW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 13.968 mg·kg⁻¹ FW; SE 8.065 mg·kg⁻¹ FW. |
| Green lettuce · Magnesium solution · N | 38.760 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.421 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.243 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Magnesium solution · Sulphate | 1.073 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.113 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.066 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Magnesium solution · Malate | 34.167 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.832 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.481 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Magnesium solution · Chlorophyll | 145.958 mg·kg⁻¹ FW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 4.858 mg·kg⁻¹ FW; SE 2.805 mg·kg⁻¹ FW. |
| Green lettuce · Potassium solution · N | 45.565 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.155 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.089 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Potassium solution · Sulphate | 1.578 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.125 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.072 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Potassium solution · Malate | 50.179 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 1.064 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.614 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Green lettuce · Potassium solution · Chlorophyll | 146.668 mg·kg⁻¹ FW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 8.080 mg·kg⁻¹ FW; SE 4.665 mg·kg⁻¹ FW. |
| Red lettuce · Calcium solution · N | 42.696 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.613 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.354 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Calcium solution · Sulphate | 1.813 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.011 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.006 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Calcium solution · Malate | 35.763 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 1.308 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.755 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Calcium solution · Chlorophyll | 275.600 mg·kg⁻¹ FW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 6.060 mg·kg⁻¹ FW; SE 3.499 mg·kg⁻¹ FW. |
| Red lettuce · Magnesium solution · N | 45.620 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.498 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.287 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Magnesium solution · Sulphate | 1.589 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.055 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.032 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Magnesium solution · Malate | 42.815 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 2.346 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 1.354 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Magnesium solution · Chlorophyll | 288.813 mg·kg⁻¹ FW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 1.735 mg·kg⁻¹ FW; SE 1.002 mg·kg⁻¹ FW. |
| Red lettuce · Potassium solution · N | 46.449 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.472 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.273 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Potassium solution · Sulphate | 2.258 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 0.178 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 0.103 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Potassium solution · Malate | 55.918 g·kg⁻¹ DW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 3.158 g·kg⁻¹ DW; SE 1.823 g·kg⁻¹ DW. |
| Red lettuce · Potassium solution · Chlorophyll | 233.377 mg·kg⁻¹ FW | Mean of n = 3 biological replicates; SD 8.128 mg·kg⁻¹ FW; SE 4.692 mg·kg⁻¹ FW. |
Note. Means calculated from the complete 2 × 3 × 3 design published by El-Nakhel et al. (2020). The downloadable table includes each replicate, standard deviation, standard error and two-way ANOVA output.
A balanced two-way fixed-effects ANOVA was recomputed from all 18 published observations. For malate, the nutrient-solution effect was F(2, 12) = 106.39 with Holm-adjusted p = 3.94 × 10⁻⁷, and the cultivar-by-solution interaction was F(2, 12) = 21.40 with adjusted p = 9.93 × 10⁻⁴. For total chlorophyll, the interaction was F(2, 12) = 25.38 with adjusted p = 4.89 × 10⁻⁴. The interaction means the solution effect changes with cultivar; one universal nutrient-to-chemistry coefficient would discard that structure.
Estimating plant nutrient state
Visible colour is useful but not chemically specific. Nitrogen limitation, water stress, senescence, exposure error and disease can all alter RGB appearance. FlavoRotor therefore joins four records at the same plant and time: the delivered elemental formulation, pH and EC history, the repeated image, and a reference measurement such as tissue mineral composition or chlorophyll. A supervised model predicts a declared laboratory endpoint, not an undefined label such as “nutrient health”.
ExplanationEstimated plant state combines a recent image sequence, delivered treatments, measured environmental conditions, cultivar and day after transplant.
Evaluation keeps all observations from one plant or cultivation cycle in the same fold. The report includes MAE for continuous chemistry, balanced accuracy for declared deficiency classes, calibration of uncertainty and performance for each cultivar and growth stage.
Why EC is insufficient
EC is an indirect bulk response to all dissolved ions. Closed systems can maintain a target EC while individual nutrients become deficient or excessive.
Four-channel implication
The four FlavoRotor channels must be assigned to chemically defined and compatible fluids. Channel labels describe the liquid, not an expected flavour. The formulation must account for coupled ions, precipitation risk, source-water composition and the limited degrees of freedom available with four reservoirs.
Validation
Recipe trials report the full elemental formulation, source water, pH, EC, solution replacement, delivered stock volumes and tissue composition. Sensory conclusions are made only after chemical and blinded sensory measurements.
